If you’d like to chime in and let us know your answers to the questions or drop a link to your post if you’re participating, please do so in the comments! And check out the IWSG website for more answers!
December 6 question: Book reviews are for the readers. When you leave a book reviews do you review for the Reader or the Author? Is it about what you liked and enjoyed about your reading experience, or do you critique the author?
Jayden: I am woefully bad at leaving reviews. I should, really. I try to at least give stars (mostly so I remember which books I enjoyed). Otherwise, I go, “I read that!” but then I can’t remember what I thought of the book. I’ll read just about anything, but that doesn’t mean I’d read it again, haha. Anyway, I prefer to leave good reviews. Everyone likes different things, so I don’t think it’s fair for me to be too critical in most cases. Just because I don’t like a twist ending that’s too far-fetched for words *coughgonegirlcough* doesn’t mean that other people won’t like it. So yeah, if I give a negative review, it has to be *really* bad, and then I’m hoping to save other readers.
Richard: I couldn’t tell you the last time I left a book review. I don’t know why you would leave a review (on a traditional site like goodreads for a trad pub book) for the author. They might read it, I guess. But, broadly speaking, reviews are for the audience. I was going to couch that and say that on a smaller site/self pub forum I’d be more likely to leave a critique directed to the author, but even then I don’t think I ever have. It feels pointless, inappropriate, and maybe even a little presumptuous. Why would I invest the time and energy in a critique unless someone wanted it? Maybe if the book/story in question was being held up as some kind of exemplar of the genre, and I wanted to absolutely trash it? Even then, I think I’d be more inclined to leave a traditional review and include a link to a critique elsewhere than to write an essay in the review section.



